James Crumbley, the father of Oxford High School shooter Ethan Crumbley, has been recorded making disturbing statements in jailhouse phone calls, labeling himself a “martyr” and threatening the prosecutor in his case. The 47-year-old, who was convicted of involuntary manslaughter along with his wife Jennifer for their role in the 2021 school shooting, expressed no remorse and instead shifted blame to the school and legal system in the profanity-laced calls.
Threats Against Prosecutor Karen McDonald
In one particularly alarming call, Crumbley directly addressed Oakland County Prosecutor Karen McDonald, who led the unprecedented decision to criminally charge the shooter’s parents. “Karen McDonald, you’re going down,” he said, adding expletives and vowing to “f–king take her down.
Crumbley also claimed to be “on a rampage” and warned McDonald that she “better be f–king scared.
Prosecutors presented these threatening statements during James Crumbley’s sentencing hearing, arguing that they demonstrate a lack of remorse and refusal to take accountability.
However, his defense attorney Mariell Lehman maintained that the calls did not constitute physical threats, but rather her client venting his frustrations while incarcerated.
Claims of Martyrdom and Fighting for Freedom
Throughout the jailhouse calls, James Crumbley portrayed himself and his wife as “martyrs” who are fighting for the freedom of others and preventing similar tragedies.
“I feel like I joined the military and going to fight for my country, you know?” he said. “I kind of feel like a martyr or martra, however you want to pronounce it.
Crumbley went on to blame the school for his son’s actions, stating “It wasn’t us! It wasn’t us! It was the f–king school!
This sentiment echoes the defense’s argument that the parents could not have foreseen Ethan’s potential for violence and that the school failed to properly respond to warning signs.
Historic Conviction and Sentencing
The jailhouse recordings surfaced just days after James and Jennifer Crumbley were sentenced to 10 to 15 years in prison on four counts each of involuntary manslaughter.
They are the first parents in the U.S. to be held criminally responsible for a mass shooting carried out by their child.
Prosecutors successfully argued that the Crumbleys were grossly negligent in providing Ethan with access to a gun, which was an early Christmas gift, and ignoring his deteriorating mental health.
On the morning of the shooting, the parents were called to the school over their son’s disturbing drawings, but resisted removing him from class and failed to disclose his access to a firearm.
Reactions and Implications
The Crumbley case has reignited debates over parental accountability in school shootings and the potential for criminal charges. Some legal experts worry about the precedent set by the conviction, fearing it could unfairly criminalize parents without direct involvement or intent.
However, prosecutors and gun control advocates argue that the verdict sends a necessary message about responsible gun ownership and intervening when a child shows signs of trouble.
“I hope it leads to more prevention of gun violence,” Prosecutor Karen McDonald stated following the conviction.
For the families of the four students killed – Madisyn Baldwin, Tate Myre, Hana St. Juliana, and Justin Shilling – the sentencing provided some closure, but also reinforced the senseless loss they have suffered.
“The punishment that you face will never be enough,” Baldwin’s mother Nicole Beausoleil told the Crumbleys in her impact statement.
As the case concludes with the sentencing of James and Jennifer Crumbley , questions remain over how to prevent future school shootings and navigate the complex dynamics of parental responsibility. The jailhouse calls serve as a chilling epilogue, underscoring the deep-rooted anger and blame still festering in the aftermath of the Oxford High School tragedy.
See more : Trump Faces Potential Prison Time as Historic Hush Money Trial Looms